Why I Use The Fish Shell
The Fish shell is not the most popular shell by any means. While it does make the top three, it’s usage is still significantly lower than the big two: bash and zsh. However, for the right person, Fish is a fantastic choice for a shell with lots of nice improvements that make working in the terminal a pleasure. Let’s talk through some of my favorite features, as well as some of the pain points and criticisms I have for Fish.
While other shells have autocompletion support with the right set of plugins or configuration, Fish includes it out of the box and it works very well. Not only can you cycle through candidate options when pressing Tab, but it also gives you predictive suggestions as you type based on your shell history, making it dead simple to execute commands repeatedly.
Let’s see a few examples!
Fish has a huge library of completions for common tools and many tools these
days that provided completion generation commands (e.g.
gh completion) support
For non-Vim users this one isn’t that big of a deal, but for me it’s a game changer. Fish has the ability to configure Vim style keyboard shortcuts to turn your terminal into a mini version of Vim, allowing you to switch between insert and normal mode, making it super simple to move around and edit a command you are working on. Also, it’s all just keybindings so you can even customizing it yourself with your own keybindings for specific modes. Here are a few of my favorites:
Another feature that I love about Fish is command syntax highlighting. Not because it makes the output in my terminal more pretty, but rather because it helps me catch mistakes more easily. When the color of a file path or command changes from red to blue, I know I’m typing a valid command, helping me catch mistakes early before running the command. Also, having commands, arguments, and strings distinguished with different colors does help when scanning through terminal history to quickly understand a command that was run.
The bad parts
One of the big selling points of fish I have yet to talk about, and that is the scripting language. The reason I waited to mention it is that I don’t actually think it’s a selling point of Fish. Let me explain why.
On the one hand, the Fish language is a very well designed shell language that much more resembles other languages without as many of the odd ways of writing programs that you might find in Bash scripts. Sadly though, this results in Fish programs being difficult to share with others. If I write a script in Fish and share it with my coworkers, many of whom probably don’t use Fish, then they won’t be able to use it. Additionally, many tutorials, StackOverflow answers, or other online resources for shell scripting will not apply as they are more than likely written in Bash rather than Fish.
I should also mention that I’m not saying this out of complete ignorance. I did for a while really try to lean into writing scripts in Fish, but I was constantly frustrated with having to recreate answers or other useful utilities I found that it became far more work that it was worth. So, while I do like the language from a theoretical standpoint, practically it doesn’t do the job for me.
Shells help us get work done while in the terminal. Some use them more than others, and most people who spend a lot of time in their terminal have some strong opinions about the best shell to use. While I definitely not so tied to Fish that I would spend hours debating that it is what you should use, I do find it helpful for my workflow and would encourage you to give it a try if you haven’t tried it before!